side by side · free to view
Compare strategies
Pick two or more and see their simulated track records head to head — growth of 1 unit invested (in each strategy's own currency) overlaid, plus every metric in one table. Best value in each column is highlighted. Simulated backtests, not predictions — how the numbers are made →
Cross-Sectional Momentum vs Dual Momentum
Dual Momentum posted the higher CAGR (21.2% vs 15.7%).
Cross-Sectional Momentum vs Trend Following (200-day MA)
Trend Following (200-day MA) posted the higher CAGR (16.0% vs 15.7%).
Dual Momentum vs Trend Following (200-day MA)
Dual Momentum posted the higher CAGR (21.2% vs 16.0%).
Inverse-Volatility Allocation vs Cross-Sectional Momentum
Cross-Sectional Momentum posted the higher CAGR (15.7% vs 13.2%).
Fast Momentum 6-1 (High Risk) vs Cross-Sectional Momentum
Fast Momentum 6-1 (High Risk) posted the higher CAGR (22.7% vs 15.7%).
Balanced Duo (Trend + Fast Momentum) vs Cross-Sectional Momentum
Balanced Duo (Trend + Fast Momentum) posted the higher CAGR (22.7% vs 15.7%).
Safe Yield vs Safe Real Yield
Safe Real Yield posted the higher CAGR (3.8% vs 2.9%).
Lottery Ticket (Speculative) vs Cross-Sectional Momentum
Cross-Sectional Momentum posted the higher CAGR (15.7% vs 9.8%).
Loading strategies…