side by side · free to view
Compare strategies
Pick two or more and see their simulated track records head to head — growth of 1 unit invested (in each strategy's own currency) overlaid, plus every metric in one table. Best value in each column is highlighted. Simulated backtests, not predictions — how the numbers are made →
Cross-Sectional Momentum vs Dual Momentum
Dual Momentum posted the higher CAGR (17.2% vs 13.5%).
Cross-Sectional Momentum vs Trend Following (200-day MA)
Trend Following (200-day MA) posted the higher CAGR (14.0% vs 13.5%).
Dual Momentum vs Trend Following (200-day MA)
Dual Momentum posted the higher CAGR (17.2% vs 14.0%).
Inverse-Volatility Allocation vs Cross-Sectional Momentum
Cross-Sectional Momentum posted the higher CAGR (13.5% vs 11.2%).
Fast Momentum 6-1 (High Risk) vs Cross-Sectional Momentum
Fast Momentum 6-1 (High Risk) posted the higher CAGR (25.6% vs 13.5%).
Balanced Duo (Trend + Fast Momentum) vs Cross-Sectional Momentum
Balanced Duo (Trend + Fast Momentum) posted the higher CAGR (20.8% vs 13.5%).
Safe Yield vs Safe Real Yield
Safe Real Yield posted the higher CAGR (3.1% vs 2.9%).
Lottery Ticket (Speculative) vs Cross-Sectional Momentum
Cross-Sectional Momentum posted the higher CAGR (13.5% vs 12.0%).
Inverse-Volatility Allocation vs Inverse-Volatility (GPW)
Inverse-Volatility (GPW) posted the higher CAGR (18.3% vs 11.2%).
Options Income via ETFs (Covered-Call ETFs) vs PutWrite Income via ETFs (Cash-Secured Puts)
PutWrite Income via ETFs (Cash-Secured Puts) posted the higher CAGR (11.8% vs 11.0%).
Options Income via ETFs (Covered-Call ETFs) vs Wheel Income via ETFs (Puts + Covered Calls)
Wheel Income via ETFs (Puts + Covered Calls) posted the higher CAGR (11.5% vs 11.0%).
PutWrite Income via ETFs (Cash-Secured Puts) vs Wheel Income via ETFs (Puts + Covered Calls)
PutWrite Income via ETFs (Cash-Secured Puts) posted the higher CAGR (11.8% vs 11.5%).
Safe Yield vs Options Income via ETFs (Covered-Call ETFs)
Options Income via ETFs (Covered-Call ETFs) posted the higher CAGR (11.0% vs 2.9%).
Defined-Outcome Buffer via ETFs (Spread Structures) vs Trend Following (200-day MA)
Trend Following (200-day MA) posted the higher CAGR (14.0% vs 10.6%).
Short-Term Mean Reversion vs Cross-Sectional Momentum
Short-Term Mean Reversion posted the higher CAGR (19.8% vs 13.5%).
Congressional Buys (Speculative) vs Cross-Sectional Momentum
Congressional Buys (Speculative) posted the higher CAGR (22.0% vs 13.5%).
Fast Momentum + Gold Sleeve vs Balanced Duo (Trend + Fast Momentum)
Fast Momentum + Gold Sleeve posted the higher CAGR (24.9% vs 20.8%).
Loading strategies…